🔗 Share this article

The Russian central bank has stated it is pursuing damages valued at $230 billion against the financial institution Euroclear. This legal step is a clear response from the Kremlin regarding proposals to utilize frozen Russian sovereign funds to aid Ukraine.

The Financial Lawsuit

Based on accounts in Russian news outlets, the central bank initiated a lawsuit last week for approximately 18 trillion roubles. This figure is equivalent to the stated $230 billion claim.

EU leaders will determine later this week regarding a plan to leverage around €210 billion in immobilized Russian assets. The proposal entails granting Ukraine with a large loan to finance its defence and economic needs.

Most of these funds, amounting to €185 billion, are held at the Euroclear depository in Brussels. Euroclear serves as the primary custodian for the Kremlin's immobilised sovereign wealth.

Divergent Legal Views

EU authorities have argued that their proposal is legally sound. They argue is based on the principle that title of the sovereign wealth remains with Russia, despite being it was immobilized in EU jurisdictions following the full-scale military offensive of Ukraine.

The Russian government, however, has labeled any use of the funds as theft. Authorities have threatened retaliatory measures, such as seizing European private investors' holdings within Russia.

The head of Russia's sovereign wealth fund, a figure who has taken on a prominent position in diplomatic talks, wrote on a social media platform that Russia "will prevail in court" and retrieve its funds. He warned that the European Union, the common currency, and Euroclear "will suffer" from the proposal.

Wider Implications

With statements interpreted as an effort to drive a wedge between Europe and the United States, Dmitriev characterized the assets plan as "a vicious assault on property rights and the global financial system created by the United States."

Euroclear declined to provide a statement on the latest lawsuit. The institution has previously stated it is facing more than 100 legal cases in Russian jurisdictions.

Legal Hurdles Ahead

While courts in European nations are not expected to enforce rulings from Russian tribunals, analysts anticipate Moscow to pursue enforcement in countries with stronger relations to the Kremlin.

"Russian monetary authorities may attempt to implement a Russian court's decision against Euroclear in jurisdictions like China, Hong Kong, the UAE, Kazakhstan, and other friendly nations, provided that relevant assets can be located," commented a legal expert from an NSP law firm.

EU Countermeasures

European authorities indicated they are working on steps to deter other nations from aiding any Russian lawsuits against European companies. Additionally, they are designing safeguards to shield EU countries with investments in Russia from what they call "unlawful expropriation."

How the Funding Would Work

According to the complex scheme, the EU would issue an first €90 billion loan to Ukraine, using the proceeds earned from the immobilized assets at Euroclear. Critically, Russia's ownership claim on the underlying funds would stay unaffected.

Kyiv would solely be required to repay the loan in the event that Russia agreed to pay reparations for the vast damage caused during the nearly four-year war.

Other Funding Ideas

Belgium, backed by Italy, Bulgaria, and Malta, has asked the EU to consider an alternative method for funding Ukraine. This involves joint EU borrowing to fund a loan, backed by unallocated funds within the EU budget.

Such a proposal, however, requires full agreement among all 27 EU countries. The Hungarian government, considered friendly with the Kremlin, has previously expressed its objection.

Commenting on Monday, the EU foreign policy chief, Kaja Kallas, said the proposed loan scheme as "the strongest option" for aiding Ukraine. "This mechanism is secured against the Russian frozen assets, meaning it doesn't come from our public funds, which is equally important," she stated. "It also sends a powerful signal that when you cause all this damage to another nation, you must pay for the reparations."